Who reviews this website
Dr. Kelsee Lothes, Au.D is a Audiologist. Dr. Kelsee Lothes, Au.D reviews this website in full: the product copy, the bottle, the ingredients, and every journal post before it is published. Nothing on this site ships until that review is done.
Dr. Kelsee Lothes, Au.D
Audiologist.
Reviews the content, the bottle, the ingredients and every post on this website.
Quiet Tone Official Website › About
AboutAbout This Quiet Tone Desk
This website is published by Quiettonedaily, the U.S. stocking partner for Quiet Tone, from New York.
The Quiet Tone Team writes every page from the label artwork and the distributor’s paperwork, prints the published trial dose beside each printed amount, and estimates nothing the label leaves inside its blend. It earns from sales made here.
Who writes these pages, what method they follow, where the money comes from and what will not change.
Who publishes this Quiet Tone website?
An organisation, its address, and the money behind it.
Quiettonedaily, the U.S. stocking partner for Quiet Tone, operating from 875 Third Avenue, Floor 28, New York, NY 10022, USA. The pages are written and reviewed by the Quiet Tone Team, which is an editorial desk inside that business rather than an individual with a byline photograph.
Naming an organisation rather than inventing a person is deliberate. Several people read the artwork, check the citations and sign off a page, and attributing that to a single fictional reviewer would be the first untrue thing on the site.
| What this desk is | What it is not |
|---|---|
| A stocking partner that sells this bottle in the United States | The manufacturer, and not the formulator |
| An editorial desk that reads the label artwork and the published literature | A laboratory, and not a testing body |
| Commercially funded by sales of the product it writes about | Independent, and this page says so rather than implying otherwise |
| A publisher of corrections, dated on the page | A medical service, and not a substitute for a hearing assessment |
Every row here is stated so a reader can discount the pages appropriately.
The commercial relationship is the part most websites of this kind leave to be inferred. This desk earns money when somebody buys the bottle through the ordering buttons here. That is a reason to read the critical sections carefully rather than a reason to dismiss them, and those sections are where the effort went.
A fair test of whether that disclosure means anything is to look at what the site prints against its own interest. The guideline covering this condition in the United States is quoted here, and it recommends against supplements for it. The panel’s only tinnitus-tested ingredient is named alongside the review that found no evidence of benefit. The blend arithmetic is set out in a way that makes the formula look small beside the trials it borrows from. None of those three helps sell a bottle, and all three are on the pages a buyer reaches first.
How this desk writes about Quiet Tone
Five rules, written down so they can be checked against the pages.
Five rules, applied to every page here. They are printed because a method that is not written down is not a method.
The label is the ceiling
This artwork prints no structure/function claim at all. It carries the name, the count, the form, the panel, the suggested use, storage, a caution, an origin line, the distributor block and the FDA disclaimer. Nothing on this website says the capsule does anything, because the bottle does not say it either.
Where the label prints an amount, the trial dose goes beside it
Nine rows on this panel carry a weight and a percent Daily Value, and each of those is checkable. Beside each one this desk prints what the published research used, which is the comparison that makes a panel readable.
Where the label hides an amount, nothing is estimated
415.5 mg covers 18 members with no split published. This desk prints the blend total and the size of the doses those plants were studied at, and does no arithmetic the label does not support. A per-ingredient figure here would be invention.
Every citation was verified in the session that wrote it
Each PubMed record behind these pages was confirmed through the NCBI search and summary interfaces rather than recalled. Where a source could not be reached, that is recorded rather than quietly dropped.
The uncomfortable facts go in the section whose job they are
A caveat repeated in every paragraph is noise. The same fact stated once, well, in a section headed honest analysis, is information. That is why the critical material on this site is concentrated rather than sprinkled.
What sources sit behind the Quiet Tone pages?
What sixty-one citations are for, and the one thing none of them does.
Sixty-one citations, listed in full at llms.txt and cited in subsets under the pages that use them. They do two jobs and only two.
They let a reader compare an amount with a trial
Where the label prints 12.5 mg of zinc, the research beside it is the Cochrane review that tested zinc for this use case. Where the label buries chamomile in a blend, the research beside it is the 1,500 mg trial so a reader can see the scale. That comparison is the most useful thing these pages do.
They carry the interactions that matter on this formula
This blend contains St John’s wort, which is the most interaction-prone botanical sold in the United States, and 5-HTP, which overlaps with serotonergic medicines. Those are named with their published records on the side effects page rather than summarised as a general caution.
What no source here does is study this capsule. No trial of this finished formula exists, and no citation on this website is offered as evidence that it inherits a trial’s findings. The clinical practice guideline governing this condition in the United States recommends against dietary supplements for persistent bothersome tinnitus and names zinc specifically, and that sits on these pages rather than being left out of them.
Sources that could not be read are recorded too. Two government fact-sheet domains answer automated requests with an error code rather than a page, so no tolerable upper intake figure is quoted from them anywhere on this site.
Where the Quiet Tone photographs come from
Three supplied images, and what two of them leave out.
All three are the distributor’s own images. Nothing here is stock photography of a different bottle, and no image on this website has been generated to fill a space.
The two scenes are worth one further sentence. Each names six ingredients, and between them they name ten of the 18 blend members while naming none of the nine printed nutrient rows. A buyer reading only the scenes would come away with a picture of the formula that the panel does not support, which is the sort of thing this desk exists to point out.
How Quiet Tone corrections work here
One address, five kinds of report, and two things that will not change.
Corrections go onto the page itself and move the review date forward. There is no errata page, because a correction filed somewhere a reader will not look is not a correction.
- Write to [email protected] with the page and what is wrong with it
- A label discrepancy is the most valuable report: the bottle in your hand outranks the artwork this desk holds
- A price that differs from the checkout is worth reporting too, because the checkout is the authority and this site is a transcription of it
- Order questions go to the desk instead, because this address cannot see an order
- Every page carries a last-reviewed date, currently September 2026
Two things this desk will not do, stated so nobody has to ask. It will not estimate an amount the label does not print, and it will not describe this capsule as doing anything to hearing, ringing or sleep, because the label attaches no effect to it.
Those two refusals cost this website traffic. They are the reason it is worth reading anyway.
Questions about this Quiet Tone desk
Who owns this Quiet Tone website?
Quiettonedaily, the U.S. stocking partner for Quiet Tone, at 875 Third Avenue, Floor 28, New York, NY 10022, USA. It is a stocking partner rather than the manufacturer.
Is this the official Quiet Tone website?
It is an official stocking partner's website for the product, and the ordering buttons hand off to the seller's own checkout. It is not the manufacturer's site.
Does this desk make money from Quiet Tone?
Yes. It earns from sales made through the ordering buttons here, which is stated on this page rather than left to be inferred.
Who writes the Quiet Tone pages?
The Quiet Tone Team, an editorial desk inside the distributor. An organisation is named rather than an invented individual with a photograph.
How do I report an error on a Quiet Tone page?
Write to [email protected]. Corrections go onto the page and move the review date forward.
Sources this Quiet Tone desk works from
A sample of the citation set, in the order the method section reaches them.
- Tunkel DE, Bauer CA, Sun GH, et al. Clinical practice guideline: tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(2 Suppl):S1-S40. PMID 25273878. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25273878/
- Person OC, Puga ME, da Silva EM, Torloni MR. Zinc supplementation for tinnitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11(11):CD009832. Three trials, 209 adults; no evidence of benefit, all outcomes very low-certainty. PMID 27879981. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27879981/
- Mao JJ, Xie SX, Keefe JR, Soeller I, Li QS, Amsterdam JD. Long-term chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized clinical trial. Phytomedicine. 2016;23(14):1735-1742. The trial dose was 1,500 mg a day, as 500 mg three times daily. PMID 27912875. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27912875/
- Pakhale K, Salve J, Ademola J, et al. Safety of 8-week administration with ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) root extract in adults with stress and anxiety. Phytother Res. 2026;40(8):5005-5015. The trial dose was 600 mg a day in two divided doses, in 1,002 adults. PMID 41943502. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41943502/
- Markowitz JS, Donovan JL, DeVane CL, et al. Effect of St John's wort on drug metabolism by induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme. JAMA. 2003;290(11):1500-4. PMID 13129991. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13129991/
- Turner EH, Loftis JM, Blackwell AD. Serotonin a la carte: supplementation with the serotonin precursor 5-hydroxytryptophan. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;109(3):325-38. PMID 16023217. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16023217/
- Alsawadi A. The perception filler: a proposed conceptual framework for ingredient-interpretation gaps in food supplements. J Nutr. 2026;156(10):101803. PMID 42660500. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42660500/
Order Quiet Tone from the desk that publishes this
One capsule a day, 30 to a bottle, prices read from the seller’s own cards, and 180 days from purchase to change your mind.
Two bottles $158 · six bottles $294 · 180-day money-back guarantee
Order Quiet Tone On The Official WebsiteOne capsule a day · 30 per bottle · lot QUI-26/QU-5380
